These Boobs Are Made for Talkin' - 
by J-Unit
By the time 2004 rolls around there is quite a change in the way Lindsay is going out and about. As you can see below at the Golden Globes, Grammys and Oscars in January and February of 04, the skirts get shorter, the tops are more sheer(and less errr, restrictive). By the time we see her at the Glamour Don't Party in April of 2004, she is entrenched in the Hollywood scene. Still, nobody is really talking about her boobs.
 |  |  |  |
Now we are at the Mean Girls premieres in Hollywood, and New York, and Lindsay is really out there. While some of us see these pictures below and say "They are real and they are spectacular!" others shout "Fake! Fake!" And as each day passes, Lindsay gives us more ways to test our theory. As the famous tank top picture shows, she is out there baby, and loving every minute of it. There might have been some time in there for her to sneak in a quick procedure, and at 17 she is probably a quick healer, but that is most likely not the case. Like the rest of young Hollywood, Lindsay frequents Joseph's, National, and the Avalon, among others, regularly, and if she had even a two week absence from the scene, somebody would have noticed.
 |  |
While I can't say that Lindsay is without a shadow of a doubt free of some saline enhancement, I think it is hard to say she has had breast work done without asking yourself some serious questions. For our final comparison, I take two shots from Mean Girls to show you what kind of dramatic effect clothing choice can have when you want to show the world what you got. Now, I know she didn't get a boob job in the middle of the movie, so there has to be some other forces at work.
 |  |
Without the presence of a doctor's bill or some definitive scar(not some blurry may be a smudge, may be a chafe, may be a fake), or a mammogram, the world is just going to have to take Lindsay's word for it. If you have any better evidence(yeah or nay), post a comment. If it's good, maybe we'll even throw a gmail invite your way.
Previous page | 1 | 2 ( Comments ) | Discuss In Our Forums
Comments
http://www.liquidgeneration.com/blog/2004/05/lindsay-lohans-breast-implants-lindsay.html
That could be photo-shopped though, I'm not really sure. Also, an US weekly from sometime last months shows a picture of her in April, then another in May (about 2 weeks apart). She seems to have grown 2 cup sizes in 2 weeks. Now THAT's talent...
Posted by: RaraAvis | June 23, 2004 2:30 PM(#1 of 23)
Rara,
I saw that link as well. The pictures listed supposedly show a scar, but the scar "tissue" is not obvious, and the same scar is not visible in other pictures before that one. Besides that, there are 3 other places where the incisions can be made for breast implants.
As for US Weekly, clothing worn plays too much of a factor in how busty you look. As the last pictures in my article show, the shape of your top can alter the way the size of your breasts.
If anybody has scans of that US Weekly shot, I'd love to have them and would post them here.
Posted by: J-Unit | June 23, 2004 2:44 PM(#2 of 23)
Christ, you obviously don't know much about female development. Apart from that, the 2004 boobs are clearly fake-looking- real boobs are like a bottom-heavy ellipse; hers are too circular and they are as big on the top half as on the bottom.
Posted by: look again | June 23, 2004 4:12 PM(#3 of 23)
I don't know. Those Mean Girls pictures are pretty hard to deny. I think they might be real.
Posted by: B-Side | June 23, 2004 5:04 PM(#4 of 23)
It's obvious that she got the implants between Dec 2002 and June 2003.. just look at the pics.
Posted by: lisa | June 23, 2004 8:08 PM(#5 of 23)
I'm with J-Unit on this one. It's impossible to say they're definately real but over the last 2 years she's been of that age where young women naturally develop. Combined with push up bras and the like, you can see how you'd get 2 drastically different before & after pictures.
Posted by: theaardvark | June 24, 2004 6:37 AM(#6 of 23)
I could spot some photoshop work done on that tank top pic. Cut her some slack. Perhaps her breasts have developed? And what with the maximiser? It's possible the only job done to her chest is a photoshop-job.
Posted by: tephanie | June 24, 2004 7:31 AM(#7 of 23)
Also, depending on where in her cycle a female is, breast size can DEFINITELY fluctuate. A lot.
Posted by: Jenn | June 24, 2004 8:56 AM(#8 of 23)
Maybe she's on the pill... that's been known to add a cup size
Posted by: TM | June 24, 2004 9:20 AM(#9 of 23)
they're real. she's 17, for god's sake. and she never needed implants to begin with -- why the hell would she get them? she's had pretty big boobs the whole time she's been in the pubic eye. she's just growing; maturing, as the adolescent female tends to do.
Posted by: lulu | June 24, 2004 12:20 PM(#10 of 23)
oh, there's also a fascinating contraption called "the push-up bra" that can miraculously make one's breasts appear way larger, rounder, and cleavage-heavy. i think she's wearing a push-up bra in a bunch of these pics where her boobs are out to there.
Posted by: lulu | June 24, 2004 12:22 PM(#11 of 23)
True, a push-up bra can work miracles, but Lindsay isn't exactly known for actually *wearing* bras. In a lot of recent pictures, she's quite obviously *not* wearing a bra.
Posted by: RaraAvis | June 25, 2004 11:59 PM(#12 of 23)
lindsay lohan is a freckly fat fart from kmart and i dont care if she gets her boobs done she should just get that fat and all those freckles removvvved
Posted by: boooowap | June 28, 2004 9:26 PM(#13 of 23)
lindsey lohans boob crack is like a mile apart- normal peoples arent that heavy, photoshop couldnt even have done that! And, normal boobs don't suddenly go WOOSH wow grown 2 cup sizes without a boob job or other kinds ofpushup bras, like the "nu-bra"
Posted by: melody06 | June 29, 2004 8:00 AM(#14 of 23)
So what if she did get a boob job - there are very few celebrities who haven't had some kind of plastic surgery these days in Hollywood. People need to stop talking shit - come on, admit it, Lindsay Lohan is a very hot item, fake tits or not!!! I'm on her side.
Posted by: Chanel | July 3, 2004 12:07 AM(#15 of 23)
Lindsay Lohan is getting WAY too much attention for all of this... i mean the only thing she's famous for is the Hillary Duff feud (whatever it is I still dont know what the hell went on)and her boobs...... great job Lindsay you made it to Hollywood!!!.... all she needs is a couple more stupid songs, another bad movie and a drug habbit or eating disorder and she'll be like all the others.HORRYAY FOR HOLLYWOOD!
Posted by: jamie | July 4, 2004 1:56 PM(#16 of 23)
i think shes fat, too fat.and i think her boobs r real made from all her fat and from the pill she is on. she should stop wearing so much make up, shes a slut. hilary is wayyyyyyyyyy better... atleast shes not so skanky
Posted by: Mwah | July 4, 2004 5:15 PM(#17 of 23)
Lyndsey needs to get a bettr make up artist, true, and so what if her boobs are fake? She certainly has a lot of "confidence" with them now...so it could actually be a good thing. Anyways, I'm sure that everyone that is posting comments is a lot older than me and you people seriously need to learn to spell!
Posted by: gen | July 7, 2004 7:34 PM(#18 of 23)
I would have to say they're fake. If you look at the pictures from her ages of 14-18 then you're clearly see that she's moved up a great amount. First of all, her body frame is rather small, making her boobs look unproportional. I don't know a person that has a D cup, that is 110 pounds or so. Secondly, she is covering it up by saying "I just wear Victoria's Secret push up bras." Well, show me a picture where she is even wearing a bra? I've seen numerous pics of her without a bra and it's obvious because of her nipple slips. Well, now, give me a person who's boobs magically stay up without a bra? Lindsay's image is becoming more and more fake, she's tan, showing off boobs, partying, loads of make-up and then big boobs pop up out of nowhere. Put all of those together and it shows, Lindsay Lohans boobs=fake as shit.
Posted by: Tiffany | July 12, 2004 11:13 AM(#19 of 23)
You and Lindsay can deny it until youre blue in the face. They ARE NOT real. She went from nothing to at least a large C-cup. Sorry. Besides, they dont look real and jesus, just look at a profile shot of her breast, saline all the way..
Posted by: Dave | July 13, 2004 12:36 AM(#20 of 23)
Her boobs only look strange in the famous 'tank top picture' because she is walking. Boobs are made of fat, so they can move up and down and jiggle from side to side..!
Posted by: Dave Sivelle | July 13, 2004 4:56 AM(#21 of 23)
Either way I bet every single one of you would bend her over and do her in the ass if she was naked in front of you. I know I would. I would play with those boobies like there is no tomorrow too.
Posted by: TheNakedMan | July 16, 2004 12:48 PM(#22 of 23)
Hell yeah they're fake. Compare her boobs when she was in Freaky Friday and her current movie Mean Girls. How can you go up 2 cup sizes in just 2 years. It's just like the Britney Spears thing all over again.
The only way you can tell if she really had a boobs job she'd have to have no shirt or bra on and then examine her naked tits are see if they look like hard balloons and if she has scars. Duh!
Posted by: Joe | July 16, 2004 5:26 PM(#23 of 23)