TVgasm's Bad News Of The Day - 
by B-side
You never know what horrors you'll find on a Hollywood studio lot...
TVgasm's Bad News Of The Day -
 |
|
 |
BuzzGasm
I Love Money : I Love Money: Stab Wound
Big Brother : Big Brother: The Donkey and the Elephant Are Both Losers Project Runway : Project Runway: Don't Carry a Dowdy Chicken On Your Shoulder |
|
 |
Find Your Favorite Shows
Recent Posts
- Industry : Newsgasm: Fox changes its Wedding plans
- Flavor of Love : Newsgasm: VH1 offers the flavor of Mo'Nique
- Survivor : Recap: Survivor: More Puzzling Than Ever
- House : Recap: House: Arrested Development
- Real World and Road Rules Challenge : Recap: The Duel: Ebony and Very Old Ivory
- Miscellaneous TV : Newsgasm: While You're Waiting For Borat To Reach Your Movie Theater...
- Dancing with the Stars : Recap: Dancing with the Stars Results: Girls Night Out?
- Miscellaneous TV : Newsgasm: Borat invades the CBS News sanctum
- Nip/Tuck : Recap: Nip/Tuck: Little People, Big Nookie
- Clipgasm : Clipgasm: Hey Mischa! Edition
Comments
That's the kind of sign that makes an actor stand back for a second and think about his career choice.
Posted by: Nick | July 19, 2005 3:56 PM(#1 of 6)
This is even worse than that casting email for the quizzno's sub kid you posted about.
Posted by: leah3t | July 19, 2005 7:10 PM(#2 of 6)
Did anyone even SEE the original Garfield? What on earth would make studio execs think that a sequel would be a good idea?
I'll never understand Hollywood.
Posted by: Lyndsay | July 20, 2005 5:51 AM(#3 of 6)
Oh come on,it was a great movie.There was the part where....ummmm ahhh.....well,then there was the bit where.......gee you know........the funny bit when.......and it was hysterical when.......errrr....uhhhh...well at least it was short.Yeah...that's it...it was short....see?I knew there was something great about it.
Posted by: Brian | July 20, 2005 1:39 PM(#4 of 6)
I thought people had to actually see the first movie before they would make a second one?
Posted by: Genevieve | July 20, 2005 2:30 PM(#5 of 6)
Wasn't that movie a bomb? Why would they make a sequel?
Posted by: dumbanddumber | July 22, 2005 7:35 AM(#6 of 6)