Once Upon a Time In Mexico - 
by J-Unit
OK, back to that ATM purchase. Sheriff Lamb started his search with the owner of the hotel where the charge came from, but found nothing there. After chasing down a few more leads, he noticed that the trunk of his cruiser had come open. When he goes to shut it again, he notices that there are a bunch of water bottles inside, and the trunk has been rigged to release from the inside. That's right, Duncan had snuck into Mexico thanks to Lamb. The Border Patrol didn't search a fellow officer's car, and Lamb had been duped as badly as he ever was.
Yes, it took me a while to get to the recap, but I had some business in San Diego, and I thought this episode was excellent. After being gone so long, I didn't feel like I was left wanting to know more about anything that was going on, with exception to the Wallace story line, which looks like it will be handled next week. We also have a very interesting scenario playing out with Duncan and the baby, and the Weevil and Logan story line might be the most interesting. While getting another tattoo, the artist working on Weevil showed him something that Felix was going to have done. It was a picture of a woman. Her name? Molly Fitzpatrick. Yes, Felix was the one working for the Fitzpatricks, which means that the search for Felix's killer and Logan's alibi is back to square one. Actually, this are so messed up, it might as well be square zero. I am really excited to see what the writers come up for that.

Did Felix learn nothing from Chardo?
What did you think of the episode? Did you ever believe that Veronica wasn't in on the plan? WWWD (What Will Wallace Do)? Who killed Felix?Previous page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 ( Comments ) | Discuss In Our Forums



Comments
I'm still not 100% sure I followed everything that happened in this episode, but it sure was a heck of a ride. Quite different than the usual mystery-of-the-week.
BTW, the girl in the truck at the end with Vincent & Duncan wasn't Vincent's girlfriend--it was Astrid, Celeste Kane's personal assistant. Well, maybe she's Vincent's girlfriend, too; this show's so damn incestuous, isn't it?
I never would have recognized her (since her hair wasn't so Veronica-like in her previous appearance on the show) but she was apparently in the "previously on Veronica Mars" shots at the beginning of the episode.
Posted by: Brian W
|
January 29, 2006 4:34 PM(#1 of 12)
My biggest beef with this episode (which was great) is that they never sufficiently explained the urgency for Duncan and Veronica to kidnap the baby. Duncan, as the biological father, would be presumed to have the right to the child. The Mannings might fight for custody, but he has all the advantages in that fight, and they certainly could not adopt out the baby without his consent. Obviously, we're supposed to believe that they were an immediate danger to the baby's life, but the way they abused their daughters was psychological brainwashing, not something that would harm a newborn. And even if there were a danger of them harming the baby right away, Duncan would have the right to take physical custody. All the talk about Meg fearing who her parents would give the baby to makes no sense, because no one can adopt the baby if Duncan objects.
Posted by: AbbyAnn
|
January 30, 2006 7:53 AM(#2 of 12)
What about the shout out at the end when they have the lost #'s on the fortune that she puts on her mirror? I think that it means that Veronica is going to solve the lost mystery also.
Posted by: trickydick
|
January 30, 2006 8:07 AM(#3 of 12)
I agree that was the first time I ever witnessed any passion between Veronica and Duncan. I'm still rooting for Veronica to give Logan another chance. The baby's name is Lily.
Posted by: hmb1974
|
January 30, 2006 11:21 AM(#4 of 12)
I thought that Veronica and Wallace were in mexico with Duncan. There were 2 hitchhikers who wished Duncan good luck, a black guy and a blonde girl. It looked like them to me. Also, vincent van low already had the baby in the truck when duncan got in. When did they hand it off?
It was a good episode. I just couldn't understand why the fbi just called off their search. they had a warrant. Why didn't they keep looking around the marses' house?
Posted by: cornelius_prot
|
January 30, 2006 1:09 PM(#5 of 12)
This was a VERY WTF-worthy episode for me. I had to rewind the episode three times to realize what was going on.
Posted by: Mark
|
January 30, 2006 5:44 PM(#6 of 12)
I'm glad I read the recap b/c I missed some of the details even though I watched it. Thanks J-Unit!
Posted by: zoobabe
|
January 30, 2006 8:52 PM(#7 of 12)
I'm not sure how I feel about this episode. It was very different from the other episodes (kind of like the episode of House where we learn the story of House's injured leg), and I don't like change. I absolutely love that Duncan snuck into Mexico in Lamb's patrol car. Brilliant! Also, it will be interesting to see how Wallace's story plays out. I didn't really believe that Veronica and Duncan were broken up because Veronica wouldn't go that emo all of a sudden, but I didn't know how they pulled off the baby heist.
Unfortunately, I agree with #2 that kidnapping plot doesn't make any sense. First of all, how can he kidnap the baby if he's the father and, according to what we've learned so far, no one else has been given custody of the child? We will probably learn that the baby was in some kind of danger, but I have another theory. Duncan didn't want to deal with the legal battle over the child, and Celeste threatened to withhold financial support for the baby AND Duncan if he chose to keep the child. In order to avoid being poor and dealing with a long legal battle, Duncan took the child to raise by himself. However, like #2 said, Duncan has legal rights to the child so I can't see the legal battle being long. Still, if Duncan couldn't afford fancy lawyers, who knows what could happen.
I also have a big question about what the long term plans of Duncan and Astrid are. Why would Astrid give up on going to law school, on Celeste's dime, and risk ruining her future by being an accessory to kidnapping? Sure Celeste treats her like crap, but why give up everything and move to Mexico because of that? Similarly, why would Duncan give up his wealthy lifestyle to move to Mexico and raise his kid? He has to assume that someday he'll get caught, so what's he planning to do when that happens?
I torn on this episode. On one hand, all the plot twists were interesting. However, the core of the storyline seems to make absolutely no sense. Unless the next episode(s) give a pretty convincing explanation for the kidnapping, this episode is going to be one of my least favorite episodes. Still, I love the show and I'm eagerly awaiting to see what the writers come up with. Sorry for the huge post.
Posted by: Weston
|
January 30, 2006 9:44 PM(#8 of 12)
I saw the LOST numbers too, dick... but only because I had to tape VM while I watched Lost IRL. Hmmmm.
Posted by: Boom
|
January 31, 2006 12:25 PM(#9 of 12)
Unpopular opinion:
I am going to miss Duncan. And... I...um...kind of got something in my eye and teared up a little. I think it's allergies.
Posted by: g3
|
January 31, 2006 5:34 PM(#10 of 12)
BTW, the girl in the truck at the end with Vincent & Duncan wasn't Vincent's girlfriend--it was Astrid, Celeste Kane's personal assistan
I didn't even notice that. Thatnks for the heads up.
AbbyAnn,
I still think that since Meg was under 18, custody goes to the parents, although I am not sure about California law specifically. Maybe a lawyerish type would like to answer.
Posted by: J-Unit
|
February 1, 2006 7:31 PM(#11 of 12)
Custody would not go to the parents, it would go to the father of the child. ALthough since Duncan is 18 and Meg was not her parents could file for Statutory (is that how you spell it?) Rape and then it would go on forever. Just becaseu the mother is underage, does not automatically give the father no rights what so ever.
Posted by: CB
|
February 2, 2006 8:43 AM(#12 of 12)