The Newsroom: Word Salad


Will’s down at Dr. Habib’s office who proves he’s a quack when he tells Will, metaphorically, that if you stand in the rain without a jacket you’ll get a cold. And it doesn’t even make sense as a metaphor because it somehow wends its way back to Will being more sensitive to betrayal because his father was abusive. Huh?

Will continues down the forked path and drops a load about accidentally stumbling upon a relationship website where the “advice columnist” suggests that a woman may bear some of the blame for her husband cheating. Now, of course that’s preposterous regardless of who the cheater/cheatee is but Will blubbers on so Dr. Habib has to cut him off and let him know that the world does not, in fact, revolve around him. That Mackenzie was probably just trying to get undumped.

Will refuses to allow anyone else be the center of attention so he wants to know why he can’t forgive her even though he’s been abusive, cruel, withholding, demeaning and punitive toward her and she just takes it. Because Will wasn’t rejected, he was betrayed. And that makes his behavior less reprehensible?

You don’t need therapy, you need a near death experience to reprioritize.

Ugh, we’re back with Neal and Sloan. He’s updating her on how he had to work at taking cheap shots at her in a comments section and tosses off the hoary comparison between balancing a personal checkbook and balancing a federal budget. Sloan takes the bait so Neal regales her with all the awful things he’s said about her and how her slutty tits are a conspiracy by the government and even changed her Wikipedia page to say she used to be a stripper, because no one knows that Wikipedia is crowdsourced and not necessarily reliable. Neal blathers on some more about trolling and Sloan indulges him that he’s a good reporter, but here’s the final word on trolls:

Because, for real, once Jay Smooth speaks your argument is invalid.

Anyway, Sloan’s understandably peeved at how gleeful Neal is about debasing her so Neal decides to tell her that he could totally get behind a government conspiracy to shove Sloan’s breasts in his face. Great googly moogly, he does realize he can lose his work permit if he gets fired with cause, right? Sloan doesn’t threaten to get him deported, because she’s classy like that, she just tells him to fix her Wikipedia page. He just promises to do it “soon.”

Charlie, Will and Mackenzie are all stewing in Charlie’s office when Jim comes in. He’s finished vetting Hancock and he’s not looking good. Poor psych eval, lowered security clearance, TRO from his wife and busted for solicitation…in 1979. Wouldn’t he have known these things about himself before he told Charlie to vet him? That doesn’t even make…never mind. Chance.

Maggie hot foots it over to Will and Mackenzie to speak in code that she wants to give Lisa talking points to make it a harder news story and Mackenzie agrees. Meanwhile, Jim goes to talk to Lisa in hair and makeup and, really, Sorkin? Do you have to make Elliot look like a fool? I thought he was Will’s protégé.

Really, Sorkin?

vallegirl
About

Vallegirl has never actually lived in a valley, has a lot of time on her hands and likes to yell at kids about how things were in her day.  Currently in LA, she's also spent a lot of time in the great states of  New York and Florida so she's not crazy, it's just a cultural thing.

3 Comments

  1. 1
    Posted August 24, 2012 at 9:46 am

    “Adam thinks they need ACN because they have “the independents.” In a primary debate.”

    According to the Internet, the Weiner scandal broke May 27, 2011, and the GOP debate immediately after that was on June 13. That was a debate that took place in New Hampshire, where independents are allowed to vote in party primaries. So it’s not completely implausible. But I refuse to accept that independents would watch ACN with Will McAvoy, Douche of All Media, as its star. Now, debates might be improved somewhat if someone were on hand to tell the audience when a candidate is lying. But Will McAvoy, Douche of All Media? Not that someone, because it would take forever for him to finish talking. Just have a screen on the stage with PolitiFact headlines scrolling by at appropriate times.

    I cringed to see that Elliot’s show is called “Right Now.” MY network has a show called “Right Now.” Give it back, Sorkin. And, yes, the poster was totally Colbert.

  2. 2
    ellemck1
    Posted August 26, 2012 at 7:36 pm

    Oh this show… I’m kinda glad my love of Tommy Zbikowski won out over my love of mocking this show and I watched Sunday Night Football instead. I think my head might have exploded.

  3. 3
    Posted August 27, 2012 at 6:47 pm

    Not completely implausible, but it can see it from where they shoot the show.

    And I can’t help but compare my other HBO show, Boardwalk Empire to this one. In addition to fleshing out and creating charismatic, maddening, engaging, flawed and relatable women, only one of whom could be considered “good,” it also educated at least me on the plight of the Lost Generation of returning WWI vets and created the most deeply committed and emotional relationship between two of those vets. Jimmy and Richard’s relationship was so compelling and really an amazing piece of writing that had nothing to do with either man’s snappy comebacks or speechifying.

    They’re so meticulous in their research that even the women’s clothing is not just era but year appropriate, while The Newsroom can’t even be assed to realize that while independents can occasionally vote in primaries, that primary campaigns differ from general election campaigns in that they appeal more to the base. Which is why the Republican debates were such good viewing. And reporting a news story doesn’t mean sitting around until someone delivers it to you tied up in a bow.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.