« Jennifer Aniston And John Mayer, Together? | | David Hasselhoff, Sober Much? »

TRIPLE FEATURE: Baby Guantanamo Kings

So I did a triple feature this weekend. Sunday I went to the Grove, and saw three movies for the price of two. They got better as the day progressed, thank god. I went from Street Kings to Harold & Kumar Escape Guantanamo Bay to Baby Mama. In the first I almost fell asleep. In the second I laughed politely a handful of times. And in the third I fell in love with Tina Fey.

bgk_babymamaposter.jpg

My expectations for Street Kings were low, which is why it took me three weeks to get around to seeing it. It would be unfair to say everyone involved in this thing is slumming, because I'm sure on paper the thing read great. I imagine Keanu and Forest and the rest of the talented cast jumped on the film just because it was penned by legendary pulp revisionist James Ellroy (The Black Dahlia, L.A. Confidential). And you know, I don't think you can fault anyone for wanting to work with Ellroy's material.

David Ayer, who directed, started out as a writer, penning effective action pics like The Fast And The Furious and Training Day. His directorial debut, Harsh Times, was here and gone before I could catch it in the theater. But now I don't feel so bad about that.

bgk_forestkeanu.jpg

The problem with Street Kings is typical of what happens when former writers start directing: Too. Much. Plot. Stuffed. Down. The. Audience's. Throat. It's as if the writer-turned-director feels the need to show off his ability to weave together as many plotlines as possible - which is what television is for. And that is precisely why Street Kings feels like a lousy episode of The Shield. I could not stop thinking about The Shield while this movie pummeled me with double cross after backstab after twist after turn after reversal. And somehow, even with all these narrative contortions happening, I almost fell asleep.

The writer-turned-director usually ends up facing the same sort of problem as the actor-turned-director - they overplay that element of cinema they most embrace, forgetting the camera is king in this world, and not the actor or the screenwriter.

bgk_harold%26kumarparachute.jpg

Rubbing the sleep from my eyes after Street Kings, I refilled my Coke and headed into Harold & Kumar Escape Guantanamo Bay. I caught Harold & Kumar Go To White Castle on cable a while back. I was surprised by how much I enjoyed it. It is competent, moves quickly, is never boring but never too good either. The same can be said for Guantanamo Bay. It is an average movie with moderate aspirations, fully aware of its limitations and never trying to push those boundaries. The laughs come easy, the romance is cute, and the cameos are fun and entertaining. Neil Patrick Harris' reprisal of himself from White Castle is great. But the showstopper in Guantanamo Bay is George Bush (James Adomian). They should've called the movie Harold & Kumar Smoke Kush With Bush. In fact, Guantanamo's biggest shortcoming is that there is not enough weed jokes. But the few that are in there are really great, particularly Kumar's ménage a trois with his ex-girlfriend and a giant bag of weed.

I was on my way to sneak into Baby Mama, but there were goons at the cinema's entrance asking for tickets. So, I walked back out to the lobby and dropped eleven-and-change for my third film of the day. Baby Mama is a very funny movie. Hilarious. Genius. A knee-slapper. Guffaw-inducing. I wiped tears from my eyes a couple times. I sank down in my seat more than once after laughing harder than I thought I should have. I hugged the person in the seat next to me. It's just a damn good time from front to back.

bgk_fey%26poehlerclass.jpg

In a very definitive exception to my proposition that writers-turned-directors churn out overly-plotted, narratively-convoluted pictures, Michael McCullers debuts as a director with phenomenal results. McCullers is partly responsible for writing the last two Austin Powers installments, and his first foray into writing and directing is very promising. He takes the absurdist elements of the Powers movies and injects them seamlessly into a story that is very much about a real woman facing a real life dilemma.

TRIPLE FEATURE: Baby Guantanamo Kings Sections:  1  |  2 

Comments (2)

TinkerbellAPixie:

Damien,

I couldn't agree with you more about Baby Mama. I saw it Sunday and thorougly enjoyed it. I'm surprised you didn't mention the supporting role of the Doorman - he was hilarious. Actually I don't think there was a single person in this movie who didn't deliver. The birthing coach, Kate's ex, Kate's family - all of them were great.

I was so delighted that they didn't use up all the funny stuff in the previews. There was actually a whole lot more to laugh at.

mynameisjenn:

i always read your posts and i really enjoyed baby mama but i have to disagree with the lucille ball reference. tina fey is so subtle and hilarious and ball so over the top. this movie was better then the previews, and made a comedy centered around women truly shine. also i saw harold and kumar and agreed with your views on that film, the first time they really addressed stereotypes in a funny way and this time felt like it was stuffing the wrongs, while poking fun, of stereotyping down my throat. the bush scene was awkward as well as the kkk scene. however, loved the redneck bit. glad i didnt catch the first movie of the review and cant wait to see what you thought of iron man.

Post a comment

141