Newsgasm: Confederacy of Dunces Edition

11 Comments

1. 1
   zevonia
   Posted February 28, 2006 at 12:37 pm

   Wow! What an interesting basis for a law suit. I’m not sure how the ladies can prove that the false advertising did them any harm, though. I mean, did any of them have even the slimmest hope of meeting Clay, falling in love, marrying and then finding out it was all a sham? Or is their complaint that Clay Aiken’s sexuality affected their enjoyment of his music? Or perhaps they are under the impression that they can catch “gay” by listening to him. How delusional are these women? Do they honestly think that any performer’s public persona is based on reality? I’m sure that very few performers show their real private side to the public. That’s why it’s called “private”.

   As to Anna Nicole- I hope she gets the money. I think she deserves some of that fortune just for putting up with the old man (and his family). Besides, then maybe she can afford not to appear on television anymore. Wouldn’t that be nice?

2. 2
   Leah3t
   Posted February 28, 2006 at 1:02 pm

   Yeah damages are going to be hard to prove in this one here. Very weird. I would ask what lawyer would ever take this case, but that question is not really worth asking these days.

3. 3
   OD-TV
   Posted February 28, 2006 at 1:40 pm

   zevonia said it all regarding the fallen “Clay Nation”. Are these people insane?

4. 4
   BigMax
   Posted February 28, 2006 at 2:48 pm

   Yes. Yes they are insane. For instance, they believed that Clay was heterosexual. I find it amusing that their complaint is based on tabloid claims that Clay is gay…as if even the claim somehow interferes with their “enjoyment”. Next thing you know, they will sue Tom Cruise (or the estate of Rock Hudson).

5. 5
   jash
   Posted February 28, 2006 at 3:29 pm

   whats with anna nicole?

   did you see her pics of her appearance today? shes hot all over again!

6. 6
   KatiesHole
   Posted February 28, 2006 at 3:56 pm

   These whacked out Claymates have got to be the dumbest women in America, who also have a lot of time on their hands. Every Claymate I’ve seen is usually obese, middle aged, wears stretch pants and has really bad hair. Even if Clay were straight, these train wrecks wouldn’t have a chance, so what are they all bitchin’ about?

   The hole is confused!

   KH

7. 7
   pamn
   Posted February 28, 2006 at 4:00 pm

   What’s with Anna Nicole, you ask?

   It’s that TrimSpa, baby!

8. 8
   m_ruv
   Posted February 28, 2006 at 4:12 pm

   I just wonder whether Ms. Smith used the time-tested “Want some monnnnnney? Like my boddddddddy?” line on Clarence Thomas.

9. 9
   TWilliams
   Posted February 28, 2006 at 4:18 pm

   Humm . . . homophobic perhaps?

   These nine woman are all church-going (I go church but am not a fanatic so don’t attack), right-wing neo-conservatives who were duped by Clay Aiken? They are more outraged by this dishonesty than the dishonesty of someone they voted for? That’s right — give me back my $16 and the hell with the future of America!

10. 10
    Leah3t
    Posted March 1, 2006 at 7:27 am

    TVWilliams- “They are more outraged by this dishonesty than the dishonesty of someone they voted for?”

    You win for wisdom of the day. I couldn’t have said it better myself. (not that I ever say anything all that well).

11. 11
    2 Old 4 This
    Posted March 1, 2006 at 1:42 pm

    Poor Anna Nicole should get the $$$ – then maybe she can afford decent extensions.

    Did you see the back of her head when the wind blew?
    Nasty!