Newsgasm: Shiloh 1, Suri 0 Edition

20 Comments

1. 1
   derder
   Posted June 6, 2006 at 10:28 am

   $4 million- unbelievable… this world of ours is somewhat pathetic- wouldn’t you say? Glad we have our priorities straight and everything…

2. 2
   doctorsnark
   Posted June 6, 2006 at 10:41 am

   yo! m_ruv! please tell me that you’re recapping the tony awards this year. after all, last year’s recap was a masterpiece” one of the funniest posts on the ˜gasm all year (and that’s saying quite a bit¦) it was almost as funny as aida.

3. 3
   m_ruv
   Posted June 6, 2006 at 11:38 am

   #2”I’m hoping to. I’ll definitely watch on Sunday but unfortunately haven’t had time to catch nearly as many of the nominated shows this year as in years past. But if Sara Ramirez and/or Clair Huxtable are there the material should write itself.

4. 4
   EdHill
   Posted June 6, 2006 at 12:40 pm

   My future fifth wife is such a cutie!

5. 5
   index
   Posted June 6, 2006 at 1:02 pm

   Whoever photoshop that picture forgot to erase the “billy bob ” tattoo on AJ’s arm.hellooooooooooo…

6. 6
   D-Hoffs
   Posted June 6, 2006 at 1:25 pm

   yeh that picture above of the Jolie-Pitts is definatelly not real.

7. 7
   Lizardqueen
   Posted June 6, 2006 at 1:45 pm

   Though I am not the first one to point it out at the gasm, my lifelong habit of transposing letters did make me shake my head and wonder “Why did they name her Pile O’ Shit?” Or worse “Pile O’ Jolie Shit”. Angelina carries on in the tradition of her parents by giving Shiloh a built in acting name. Shiloh Nouvel (Jolie-Pitt), just like Angelina Jolie (Voight) and James Haven (Ifuckedmysister).

   {re the transposing of letters: Two of my childhood favorites came right from my mom’s kitchen- Food rags= Rude fags and Pumpkin soup= Sumpkin poop. I am ridiculous.}

8. 8
   umnata
   Posted June 6, 2006 at 1:46 pm

   only 6,565 more days little shiloh!

9. 9
   jash
   Posted June 6, 2006 at 2:11 pm

   re the pic above, did no one pay attention to the news item saying the pics would appear in PEOPLE magazine?

   if so, then someone also forgot to photoshop off the title of the UK tabloid from the PEOPLE cover.

   “oops”

10. 10
    KatiesHole
    Posted June 6, 2006 at 4:02 pm

    Did that redneck slutty whore-y hillbilly white trash skank get a divorce yet?

    When will the world be rid of this tacky , disgusting display of filth that is Britney Spears?

    Dare I say, but I miss the trashy antics of that low rent latina J-Ho compared to this Spears mess.

    KH
    Its an outrage.

11. 11
    tvtvtv
    Posted June 6, 2006 at 9:50 pm

    I’ll take that bet! Four weeks at least. Then the coupling with the manny will coincide with July fourth and will result in some cheesy “Independence Day” song. (Or is she done with music now and just sticks to the breeding of babies and bleaching of hair?)

12. 12
    Jess
    Posted June 7, 2006 at 4:57 am

    A) I think Angelina’s still going through the laser tattoo removal process, so remnants of the tattoo remain. I’m going through the same thing, and it takes forever.

    B) People magazine AND Hello magazine got rights to the photo. One in UK, one in US. (from what I understand.)

13. 13
    doctorsnark
    Posted June 7, 2006 at 7:41 am

    m_ruv… if you’re still on the fence about recapping, do it for the fans at home! maybe that will be enough of a gentle nudge to push you off– just be careful how you land. protect your hands and face!

14. 14
    Laurie
    Posted June 7, 2006 at 7:43 am

    That’s right Jess. People got the North American Rights, and Hello got the UK and European rights.

15. 15
    Clair
    Posted June 7, 2006 at 9:45 am

    You guys are in SO much trouble!!!

    Attorneys acting for American publication People magazine have demanded websites immediately remove unauthorized photographs of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie with their new baby. The couple sold the North American rights for the prized first pictures of daughter Shiloh Nouvel Jolie-Pitt to the magazine for a reported $4.1 million. Britain’s Hello! magazine has reportedly secured the international rights to the photos, which allegedly appeared on various gossip blogs yesterday. It is not clear whether the pictures that appeared briefly are authentic. The leaked photos feature Pitt and Jolie in a Hello! magazine spread gazing down adoringly at their new baby. Representatives for Time Inc, the publisher of People magazine, immediately sent out letters threatening legal action to various gossip blogs accusing them of copyright infringement. The document demands the websites must “expeditiously remove or disable access to the infringing photograph upon receiving this notice.” The celebrity couple announced on Monday they were selling the photos through America’s Getty photo agency and donating the profits to a charity benefiting African children.

16. 16
    HoneyBunny
    Posted June 7, 2006 at 2:45 pm

    If you do get sent up the river will you blog it?
    With pictures?

    hb

17. 17
    TinkerbellAPixie
    Posted June 7, 2006 at 3:14 pm

    I heard Perez Hilton on the news (ick) talking about how he had the photo on his site but had to yank it. [Insert your own joke here]

18. 18
    KatiesHole
    Posted June 7, 2006 at 3:58 pm

    That fat load Perez Hilton will whore himself out in any way to get on TV. She’s disgusting.

    KH

19. 19
    tvtvtv
    Posted June 7, 2006 at 9:19 pm

    hb, a tvgasm recap of a trip to the slammer would be hi-la-rious. (But then again, if it’s only an internet infraction, maybe they just lock you up in a flatscreen like they did poor Celine in the Collins recap.)

20. 20
    amy303_1/2
    Posted June 8, 2006 at 8:22 am

    “If you do get sent up the river will you blog it?
    With pictures?

    hb”
    HaHaHa!! That made my ho-hum morning. Thanks!