Newsgasm: Shiloh 1, Suri 0 Edition - 
by m_ruv

- It's official: the first photos of Shiloh Jolie-Pitt have been sold to Time Warner (the parent of People magazine) for $4.1 MILLION. All proceeds are going toward the construction of a Baby Prada factory outlet in Addis Ababa. [NY Post]
- Soon-to-be-ex-Mrs. Paul McCartney, Heather Mills, apparently had a brief but titillating stint as a porn actress in an explicit German coffee-table book published in 1988. She WOULD be all schmutzig in her Frauplatz. [The Sun]
- American Idol non-winner Chris Daughtry has turned down an offer to become the new frontman of Fuel. Instead, he's considering positions with Bread, Air, and several other "staple" bands. [Reality Blurred]
- Oprah went on a rampage this weekend, crashing several wedding receptions in the Tulsa area in order to tape footage for her show. Next week she plans to airdrop a shitload of Pontiacs on some civil unions in Provincetown. [AP]
- And thankfully, Britney Spears has hired a "manny" to help care for her baby and provide a responsible male presence in the household. Fifty bucks says she marries this guy within two weeks. [Daily Mail]



Comments
$4 million- unbelievable... this world of ours is somewhat pathetic- wouldn't you say? Glad we have our priorities straight and everything...
Posted by: derder
|
June 6, 2006 10:28 AM(#1 of 25)
yo! m_ruv! please tell me that you're recapping the tony awards this year. after all, last year’s recap was a masterpiece— one of the funniest posts on the ‘gasm all year (and that’s saying quite a bit…) it was almost as funny as aida.
Posted by: doctorsnark
|
June 6, 2006 10:41 AM(#2 of 25)
Shiloh is pretty damn cute ... but she needs to drop the Nouvel from her name, its a bit much
Did anyone see the Cracked magazine list of 10 gay movie and TV duos? So funny ... but I also found a list of 10 movie/tv lesbian duos ... check it out at
http://afterportia.blogspot.com
Posted by: flipkicks
|
June 6, 2006 10:55 AM(#3 of 25)
#2—I'm hoping to. I'll definitely watch on Sunday but unfortunately haven't had time to catch nearly as many of the nominated shows this year as in years past. But if Sara Ramirez and/or Clair Huxtable are there the material should write itself.
Posted by: m_ruv
|
June 6, 2006 11:38 AM(#4 of 25)
"Manny" made me laugh out loud. And that baby's pretty darn cute.
Posted by: gina64
|
June 6, 2006 12:10 PM(#5 of 25)
My future fifth wife is such a cutie!
Posted by: EdHill
|
June 6, 2006 12:40 PM(#6 of 25)
Why, oh why did I click on that link about Heather Mills' porn past? Grotty & not sexy at all.
And Shiloh is really cute! :) Suri definitely loses... IF she even exists.
Posted by: stacyrocks
|
June 6, 2006 1:02 PM(#7 of 25)
Whoever photoshop that picture forgot to erase the "billy bob " tattoo on AJ's arm.hellooooooooooo...
Posted by: index
|
June 6, 2006 1:02 PM(#8 of 25)
yeh that picture above of the Jolie-Pitts is definatelly not real.
Posted by: D-Hoffs
|
June 6, 2006 1:25 PM(#9 of 25)
Though I am not the first one to point it out at the gasm, my lifelong habit of transposing letters did make me shake my head and wonder "Why did they name her Pile O' Shit?" Or worse "Pile O' Jolie Shit". Angelina carries on in the tradition of her parents by giving Shiloh a built in acting name. Shiloh Nouvel (Jolie-Pitt), just like Angelina Jolie (Voight) and James Haven (Ifuckedmysister).
{re the transposing of letters: Two of my childhood favorites came right from my mom's kitchen- Food rags= Rude fags and Pumpkin soup= Sumpkin poop. I am ridiculous.}
Posted by: Lizardqueen
|
June 6, 2006 1:45 PM(#10 of 25)
only 6,565 more days little shiloh!
Posted by: umnata
|
June 6, 2006 1:46 PM(#11 of 25)
re the pic above, did no one pay attention to the news item saying the pics would appear in PEOPLE magazine?
if so, then someone also forgot to photoshop off the title of the UK tabloid from the PEOPLE cover.
"oops"
Posted by: jash
|
June 6, 2006 2:11 PM(#12 of 25)
Did that redneck slutty whore-y hillbilly white trash skank get a divorce yet?
When will the world be rid of this tacky , disgusting display of filth that is Britney Spears?
Dare I say, but I miss the trashy antics of that low rent latina J-Ho compared to this Spears mess.
KH
Its an outrage.
Posted by: KatiesHole
|
June 6, 2006 4:02 PM(#13 of 25)
I'll take that bet! Four weeks at least. Then the coupling with the manny will coincide with July fourth and will result in some cheesy "Independence Day" song. (Or is she done with music now and just sticks to the breeding of babies and bleaching of hair?)
Posted by: tvtvtv
|
June 6, 2006 9:50 PM(#14 of 25)
A) I think Angelina's still going through the laser tattoo removal process, so remnants of the tattoo remain. I'm going through the same thing, and it takes forever.
B) People magazine AND Hello magazine got rights to the photo. One in UK, one in US. (from what I understand.)
Posted by: Jess
|
June 7, 2006 4:57 AM(#15 of 25)
m_ruv... if you're still on the fence about recapping, do it for the fans at home! maybe that will be enough of a gentle nudge to push you off-- just be careful how you land. protect your hands and face!
Posted by: doctorsnark
|
June 7, 2006 7:41 AM(#16 of 25)
That's right Jess. People got the North American Rights, and Hello got the UK and European rights.
Posted by: Laurie
|
June 7, 2006 7:43 AM(#17 of 25)
You guys are in SO much trouble!!! :)
Attorneys acting for American publication People magazine have demanded websites immediately remove unauthorized photographs of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie with their new baby. The couple sold the North American rights for the prized first pictures of daughter Shiloh Nouvel Jolie-Pitt to the magazine for a reported $4.1 million. Britain's Hello! magazine has reportedly secured the international rights to the photos, which allegedly appeared on various gossip blogs yesterday. It is not clear whether the pictures that appeared briefly are authentic. The leaked photos feature Pitt and Jolie in a Hello! magazine spread gazing down adoringly at their new baby. Representatives for Time Inc, the publisher of People magazine, immediately sent out letters threatening legal action to various gossip blogs accusing them of copyright infringement. The document demands the websites must "expeditiously remove or disable access to the infringing photograph upon receiving this notice." The celebrity couple announced on Monday they were selling the photos through America's Getty photo agency and donating the profits to a charity benefiting African children.
Posted by: Clair
|
June 7, 2006 9:45 AM(#18 of 25)
i was coming to warn you, but somebody beat me to the punch.
http://movies.msn.com/movies/article.aspx?news=224875
i say rebel against those bigwigs! don't let them push us tvgasmers around.
Posted by: babeblue
|
June 7, 2006 1:57 PM(#19 of 25)
If you do get sent up the river will you blog it?
With pictures?
hb
Posted by: HoneyBunny
|
June 7, 2006 2:45 PM(#20 of 25)
I heard Perez Hilton on the news (ick) talking about how he had the photo on his site but had to yank it. [Insert your own joke here]
Posted by: TinkerbellAPixie
|
June 7, 2006 3:14 PM(#21 of 25)
That fat load Perez Hilton will whore himself out in any way to get on TV. She's disgusting.
KH
Posted by: KatiesHole
|
June 7, 2006 3:58 PM(#22 of 25)
Soon-to-be-ex-Mrs. Paul McCartney, Heather Mills, explains it all:
Sir Paul McCartney's estranged wife Heather Mills has denied allegations she appeared in a "hardcore porn" shoot for a German book.
The animal rights campaigner, who found fame after losing a leg in a road traffic accident in 1993, performs a number of sexual acts in photographs in German book 'Die Freuden Der Liebe' ('The Joys Of Love'), according to a report in yesterday's (05JUN06) edition of British newspaper The Sun.
Mills readily admits she appeared in the lover's guide published in 1988, but her lawyers insist The Sun falsely portrayed it as part of a "filthy past" of which McCartney was unaware.
A letter sent to The Sun editor Rebekah Wade reads, "This photo shoot, undertaken approximately 20 years ago, was for the purpose of a 'lover's guide' to caring relationships and instructive sex in the same way as are many other books on the market.
"The photo shoot was not pornographic or for the purposes of gratification of the viewer."
A spokesperson for The Sun responds, "The Sun was only able to publish a few images of the 172 printed in 'Die Freuden Der Liebe' due to the obscene and pornographic nature of the photographs.
"Far from being an instruction manual, the book contains not a word of text."
Posted by: Clair
|
June 7, 2006 7:27 PM(#23 of 25)
hb, a tvgasm recap of a trip to the slammer would be hi-la-rious. (But then again, if it's only an internet infraction, maybe they just lock you up in a flatscreen like they did poor Celine in the Collins recap.)
Posted by: tvtvtv
|
June 7, 2006 9:19 PM(#24 of 25)
"If you do get sent up the river will you blog it?
With pictures?
hb"
HaHaHa!! That made my ho-hum morning. Thanks!
Posted by: amy303_1/2
|
June 8, 2006 8:22 AM(#25 of 25)